Goldwater page 158

Reply by Mangus Colorado, Moderator on December 14, 2012 at 11:31am

Delete

Conspiracy theory links . . .

Capitalism and Individualism Versus

Collectivism and Monopolies

The Collectivist Conspiracy
Glenn Beck Interviews G. Edward Griffin
One World Government
A New Currency is Coming Soon Part 1 

A New Currency is Coming Soon Part 2
HIV, AIDS and Big Pharma
A World Without Cancer
What Are Thet Spraying
Government Has Become a Crime Syndicate
United Nations Exposed
Fiat Empire
An Idea Whose Time Has Come
The Fall of the American Empire
The Federal Reserve
The Illusion of Paper Money Part 1

The Illusion of Paper Money Part 2

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mangus Colorado, Moderator on December 14, 2012 at 11:34am

Delete

The Five Thousand Year Leap The reason that this course of study is so important is that it outlines the 28 principles upon which our nation was founded.The things that we believe govern our actions and ultimately determine our destiny. The reason our country is on the verge of destruction is due to the fact that the people have lost their moral compass. In order to restore our Constitutional Republic we must rediscover the principles that were embraced by our Founding Fathers.The 5,000 Year Leap contains the recipe for peace, prosperity and freedom. The following 14 video presentations are an introduction to the "5,000 Year Leap".There are a total of 28 principles that are the foundation of sound government. The Princples of Liberty America's 5,000 Year Leap The Value of Knowing Principles The Political Spectrum Natural Law A Free People Must Be Virtuous The Proper Role of Government The Frailties of Leaders Property Rights Separation of Powers Strong Local Self Government No Entangilng Alliances Avoid the Burden of Debt  Manifest Destiny Earl Taylor Jr. Purchase the Book - Click Here The Founders Unchanging Principles of Liberty Memorizing the 28 Principles

 

Copy this into your email and then change text color if necessary.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mangus Colorado, Moderator on December 14, 2012 at 2:53pm

Delete

Peter Schweizer on Muni Bonds By Reihan Salam December 13, 2012 3:25 P.M. Comments 1 Print Text    Peter Schweizer of the Government Accountability Institute has an article calling on Congress to start taxing municipal-bond interest as ordinary income: Why would Republicans agree to eliminate a tax break? Simple: municipalities have become big spenders swimming in debt. Low interest rates and the current tax exemption make borrowing money cheap, thereby encouraging debt. The Federal Reserve reports that state and local government debt doubled over the last ten years, rising from $1.4 trillion in 2002 to $3 trillion in 2011. Shrink the incentive to bankroll big spending and you shrink the size of government—something most Republicans say they support. But there’s another reason Democrats and Republicans can find common ground in ending tax breaks on municipal bonds: they’re rife with cronyism. Some municipal bonds are issued for a city’s essential services, such as sewers and roadways, but many others go for non-essential, corporate enterprises. When local governments pick winners and losers, they force others to compete with government-funded cronies financed at lower rates than private companies enjoy—again, a theme Republicans rail against. That injects more corporate cash into local politics, something Democrats speak out against. According to Schweizer, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that eliminating the tax break for municipal-bond interest would generate $124.4 billion over the next decade. John McKinnon and Andrew Ackerman of the Wall Street Journal report that the Obama administration and congressional Republicans seem open to the idea of at least curbing this deduction: Even if the two sides reach a deal on the fiscal cliff—a combination of automatic tax increases and spending cuts scheduled to hit in early January—it might not include taxing municipal-bond interest. But the idea could resurface next year if Congress moves to overhaul the tax code, as many expect. It is unclear whether the approach would apply only to newly issued bonds. This sounds promising, and it could be part of a larger tax deal that could advance pro-market objectives.